In August of 2022, an AI-generated artwork won first place in a fine art competition in Colorado.
Jason Allen, president of a gaming company called Incarnate Games, submitted a canvas print of “Théâtre D’Opéra Spatial” (French for Spatial Opera Theater), a piece he had created using Midjourney. The contest’s definition of digital art was broad enough to make AI work eligible. And to what Allen says, he clearly labeled it as a piece created via Midjourney. Still, artists were outraged and started to raise ethical concerns.
Allen explained that he had spent hours over hours figuring out the right prompts that eventually enabled him to create this piece. He added that he processed the work in Photoshop and then finished it in Gigapixel.
Allen is aware of the controversy his submission caused but is convinced that the art world will eventually recognize AI art as its own category.
His reasoning behind why AI art should be considered real art?
Well, Allen suggests that the difficulty of creating an AI piece through a complicated series of prompts may be comparable to a painter making “their art while hanging upside-down and being whipped while painting.” Still, the art of that painter is evaluated the same way as the work of a painter who creates a similar piece ‘normally’.
In other words, Allen believes that AI-generated images are not less valuable than man-made art just because AI art is easier to create.
AI art is just a gimmick. Real art comes from human emotion and experience. Machines can’t truly understand or express those deep, personal feelings that make art meaningful. Let’s not dilute the essence of true creativity with artificial intelligence.
Hi Damian, I agree that AI-generated images lack emotion and experience. Every time I see an AI image, I’m wondering who is actually the one creative: the human entering the prompts or the machine making something out of them?!
I appreciate the exploration of AI in art, but I think it’s important to distinguish between art created by humans and art generated by algorithms. While AI can produce interesting visuals, the emotional depth and intention behind human-created art are irreplaceable.
Hi Jonathan, I actually hold the same view. Art requires the human element in order to be considered art. Even if the promptor appoaches the generation with emotion and intention, the AI still creates *without* feelings and emotions…