To understand where this assumption comes from and why it was said in the first place, we need to take a look at artificial intelligence. Huh? What has artificial intelligence to do with whether or not you should make art?
Well, the statement that “art is dead, dude” was actually made by computer engineer Jason Allen after he had won a fine arts competition with an AI-generated image. To be precise, Allen didn’t create the image using Photoshop or similar digital art software.
Instead, he used a so-called text-to-image generator. Allen entered a specific set of word prompts, and the generator returned a visual output based on the text he entered. In his case, it was the image generator Midjourney.
Obviously, this is not the usual way to create art, and in consequence many artists got upset. First of all, they believe that AI art cannot be considered real art and therefore shouldn’t be allowed for a fine arts competition.
Second of all, they got outraged by Allen’s bold statement who apparently considered his piece artsy enough to submit it to a traditional digital arts competition on the one hand, but sneers at manmade artwork on the other hand.
I’ve already discussed what artists think of AI art in a previous post, so I don’t want to touch upon all the different opinions in this post again.
In today’s post, I want to talk about why it is still worth it becoming an artist in times of AI art and why it will always be worth it creating art yourself – even if you don’t do it on a professional level. So let’s dive in!