When I hear that question, I get the impression that it implies that the arts are inherently selfish. If you are making art, you cannot be anything but selfish. Being an artist means being selfish.
When have you ever heard a question like, is being a doctor selfish? Or like, is being a lawyer selfish? Even though some individuals working in those professions may well be considered greedy, those occupations are not routinely thought of as being selfish.
However, when it comes to the arts, it’s much more commonplace to ask that question.
What is the difference between the arts and other professions?
In my opinion, it all comes down to the fact that being an artist is not considered a real job in our society. You can make art for your leisure, but not for a living. You need a real job that pays the bills and provides you with social status.
The starving artist is still one of the myths about artists that is deeply engrained in our thoughts.
In that context, I also came across the argument that pursuing the arts is selfish because it introduces a lot of uncertainty and risk to your life. Sure, you need to take risks in art.
But I’d argue that opening your own doctor’s or lawyer’s office also involves a risk. And that risk is even much higher, as compared to starting your own art business—just think of all the expenses you need to make and equipment you need to buy to get your own doctor’s or lawyer’s office running.
To create art, on the other hand, all you need to invest in is a drawing tablet—in the best-case scenario… (ᴖ‿ᴖ)